in 1821, Alexander Mackintosh wrote the first known description of the fly known as the Black  Dog in his book “The Driffield Angler.  Used on the Tay, for Atlantic Salmon, it was popular and successful.  His pattern is as follows:

“The hook, no. 1, and the shank near 3 inches long; the wings, the bluish feather from the herons wing intermixed with the spotted reddish  one from the turkeys tail; feathers for the body, lead coloured hog’s soft wool from under the  ear, small gold twist, a large black cocks hackle; the head a little dark green mohair and dark green silk. ”

He proceeds to describe  the making of this fly, which really is not too difficult to follow.  The interesting bit however that bothered me at the time, but I did it anyway, is he describes running the twist between and around the wings “three or four times… making it appear as much as possible about the head.”  He then covers this with the mohair.  Interesting and once done, it serves to insure that the two wings never will fold together again except under extreme pressure.

The fly you see on the left is the Mackintosh version true to the pattern in all respects.  The hackle is tied in full and facing backwards to present a sleek but bushy profile.  I married, strand for strand the two wing components, though I am certain that this was not done in the original.  I suspect that either one or the other was tied in as shown, with the second either as strands under or over, or both were tied in as mixed strands and separated into two bunches with the twist.   I thought that this would be a much nicer look though, despite it taking more time to marry the wings then it did to do the rest of the fly, including mounting the wings.

Francis Francis, in 1867 wrote in his book “A Book on Angling” the next description, and in it we can see the changes the fly had undergone over time.  Here you can see how I have tied the wings in the Dee style rather than the Tay style as the previous Black Dog has been tied in, even though it is described as a Tay fly.  I wanted to see how it would look as a Dee.  I also tied the hackle in sparse, stripping one side and facing it backwards so as to give better action under water.  The pattern, from page 363 of the Classics of Salmon Fishing edition is as follows:

“The Black Dog– Tail, a tuft of olive-yellow pig’s wool; body, black mohair; gold and silver tinsel with orange silk between; two or three black hackles; gallina at the shoulder; wing, grey speckled turkey, two long slips.  The hook is 3 1/2 inches long and 7/8 of an inch wide, and the succeeding flies rundown to  2 inches or even smaller.”

Again the fly is tied as per the materials listed, though I only needed one good long hackle instead of the two or three shorter ones.  I used an oily green-tinted black one for a nice effect.

The photo shows a distinct red tint, which is unfortunate and is not actually present in the fly.  It is an artifact of my poor photography skills.

I mentioned the edition I used as there are other editions of this work.  I have on cd a pdf scan of a different edition, published in 1920, edited by and with a lengthy forward by Sir Herbert Maxwell, where, though the pattern listed is identical to the above, there is a lovely colour plate of a fly labeled The Black Dog that looks nothing like the described pattern, but instead resembles nothing less than  a stripped down version from the next person to take up this pattern, George M. Kelson.  The pattern in the illustration can best be described as follows:

Tag: silver tinsel, yellow floss

Tail: topping and red fibres, probably scarlet ibis

Butt: black herl

Body: black silk

Ribbing: gold and silver tinsel, yellow floss between

Hackle:  none

Throat: black heron long, to the point or longer

Wing: two red-orange (or claret?) hackles back to back, enveloped by two long jungle cock, golden pheasant tail over this, possibly peacock herl, teal  and a topping over.

Sides: Jungle cock

The hook is quite long, as expected.  The illustration provided is scanned directly from the PDF scan of the original book.blackdogff1920

I have repeatedly combed both editions for the actual written mention of this version, with no success.  The question remains, How did this fly, obviously a more modern version,  get into a book published in 1865?  I suspect that what happened is that during the process of editing the 1920 version, Maxwell decided he needed new plates for the flies.  Choosing popular flies, he commissioned the plates, but did not cross-reference the fly with the pattern in the book.  As he did not actually write the book, he may have been unaware that the pattern and the plate did not correspond with each other.  Francis Francis was dead by this time and could not tell him either.  I will have to check and see if some of the other flies illustrated show similar pattern shifting.  If this is the case though, then the version Maxwell chose was not his or Kelson’s, but the fly of the day as it were.  Compare it with Kelson’s or Maxwell’s and see how it has been simplified.

George M. Kelson, in 1895 or 6, published his book The Salmon Fly and in it is a pattern he describes as ” An old standard of my father’s, and a useful high water fly – very good on the Spey, Wye, etc.”

blackdogkelThe pattern, much like the above only more so is as follows:

Tag: silver tinsel, canary floss

Tail: topping and scarlet ibis

Butt: black herl

Body: black silk

Ribbing: Yellow silk, and oval silver tinsel running on each side of it.

Hackle:  Black heron from the third yellow rib

Wing: two red-orange hackles back to back, enveloped by two long jungle cock, unbarred summer duck, light bustard, Amherst pheasant tail, swan dyed scarlet and yellow, and two toppings.

This is the pattern most people know and tie today.  I have done the wing in the style Kelson personified, ie strand for strand marrying of each of the sections, repeating at least three times.  The red shift is again my poor photography.

Next to describe the Black Dog was Sir Herbert Maxwell in his book “Salmon and Sea Trout, 1898.  He writes of the Black Dog: “This is the modern version of a very old Tay pattern.  Black used to be the prevailing tone, but gay colours have been added to keep it abreast of the fashion.  It is used as a large Spring pattern, 20-17.”  I have a first edition that lists the pattern as follows:

blackdogmaxTag- silver tinsel

Tail- a topping or tuft of orange mohair

Butt- black chenille

Body- black floss, ribbed with ruby floss, on one side of which is broad silver tinsel, on the other gold twist.

Hackle- black cock’s over the body, at the shoulder a long-fibred heron hackle dyed crimson

Wing- two tippets, then mixed gold pheasant tail, bustard, strips of crimson, yellow and orange dyed swan, peacock herl, a slice of wood duck, large topping over, red macaw horns.

Head- black chenille

This is clearly not the fly in the 1920’s version of Francis Francis either, but is a lovely fly none-the-less.  It obviously did not resonate as well as the Kelson version with the fishing public though, since it is not the pattern most folk know today.

Another author who described the Black Dog was Capt. John Henry Hale in his “How to Tie Salmon Flies” 1892.  His version, attributed to Mr. Malloch is as follows:

blackdoghaleTag.  Silver twist and yellow floss

Tail. Topping and a few fibres of scarlet ibis

Butt. Black ostrich herl

Body. Black floss ribbed with gold and silver oval tinsel; orange floss between the two tinsels.

Hackle. Black heron at the shoulder only

Wings. Mixed- bronze peacock herl, silver-grey turkey, bustard, pintail, teal, summer duck,  mallard, swan, dyed red yellow and blue, topping over.

Cheeks. Jungle cock

Horns. Blue macaw

Head. Black

blackdoghardyThe only other old author I could find who listed the Black Dog is  John James Hardy in his book “Salmon Fishing” from 1897.  The pattern he describes is identical to Kelson’s pattern, as are a lot of the flies in his book.

There is one other pattern that has been published that I am aware of, and as far as I can tell wrongly attributed to Francis Francis by Mikael Frodin in his marvelous work “Classic Salmon Flies, History and Patterns” from 1991, Stoeger Publishing Co.   In his account of the Black Dog he describes the Francis Francis version accurately, then goes on to talk about a second version, “more like the one Kelson provides.”  It is as follows:

Tag: silver tinsel

Tail: a topping

Butt: black ostrich herl

Body: black floss

Ribs: silver and gold tinsel and red silk, side by side.

Hackle: black all the way up

Shoulder: a very long fibred heron’s hackle dyed blue

Wings: a mixed wing, the underwing a tippet feather with slices of wood duck over, the overwing mixed fibres of golden pheasant tail, bustard, claret, yellow and orange swan, speckled peacock and some peacock herls, blue and yellow macaw and a topping over all.

Head: black

blackdogfrodinThis lovely fly is much more like Maxwell’s version in my opinion, then like Kelson’s.   It does not resemble the written Francis Francis pattern in the least however in either of the two versions I have examined, and only marginally resembles the illustrated version in the 1920 edition of the same author.   I have been unable to discover the correct author of this pattern,  and emails to Mikael Frodin have not produced satisfactory results.

Currently this is the extent of the research results for the Black Dog.  I welcome any additional information on this fly, especially if it is verifiable information on the origin of the “second Francis Francis” pattern and the actual pattern and attribution for the one in the plate in the 1920’s edition of Francis Francis “A Book on Angling”.